Kant ⚡ Legit

If all knowledge requires both intuitions (via space/time) and concepts (via categories), then human knowledge is strictly limited to —objects as they appear to a spatiotemporal, discursive intellect. The noumenon (thing-in-itself) is the merely intelligible object, an object not given to sensible intuition. While we must think noumena as the ground of appearances, we can never know them.

The Architectonic of Pure Reason: A Systematic Overview of Immanuel Kant’s Critical Philosophy If all knowledge requires both intuitions (via space/time)

This distinction is the death knell for traditional rationalist metaphysics. When reason attempts to use the categories beyond the bounds of possible experience (e.g., asking for the absolute beginning of the world in time, or for the existence of a necessary being), it falls into and antinomies —equally valid but contradictory conclusions. Kant thus “denies knowledge to make room for faith.” While theoretical reason cannot prove God, freedom, or immortality, practical reason (morality) can postulate them as necessary conditions of the moral law. The Architectonic of Pure Reason: A Systematic Overview

Kant’s genius was to reconceive the subject-object relation. Instead of assuming that the mind must conform to objects, Kant proposed that . Just as Copernicus hypothesized the earth’s motion to explain celestial observations, Kant hypothesized that the mind actively structures experience. Thus, we can have a priori (experience-independent) knowledge not of things as they are in themselves ( noumena ), but of things as they appear to us ( phenomena ). we can never know them.