7.5/10 Recommendation: Recommended for students of film studies, diaspora studies, and those interested in mainstream cinema’s handling of political trauma.
My Name Is Khan is a flawed but courageous film. It uses the framework of a Bollywood melodrama to pose a deeply human question: What does it mean to be a Muslim in post-9/11 America? While its solutions are idealistic, its diagnosis of fear, grief, and scapegoating remains sharp. The film endures not as a political treatise but as a character study of a man who, despite his disability, sees the world more clearly than those around him. Its central declaration—“My name is Khan, and I am not a terrorist”—is a simple, powerful plea for the separation of an individual from a stereotype. For that alone, the film remains relevant.
A Critical Analysis of My Name Is Khan (2010): Disability, Islamophobia, and the Pursuit of Justice
My Name Is Khan is a 2010 Indian Hindi-language drama film directed by Karan Johar, produced by Dharma Productions, and starring Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol. The film marked a significant departure from Johar’s typical romantic melodramas, tackling heavy socio-political themes following the 9/11 attacks. This report provides an overview of the film’s plot, analyzes its key characters and themes, evaluates its cinematic techniques, and assesses its critical and cultural impact.
The film follows Rizwan Khan (Shah Rukh Khan), a Muslim man with Asperger’s syndrome, who moves to San Francisco to live with his brother after his mother’s death. He falls in love with a Hindu single mother, Mandira (Kajol), and they build a happy life together. Their world is shattered by the 9/11 attacks, which trigger widespread Islamophobia. After a tragic misunderstanding leads to the death of Mandira’s son, she blames Rizwan and tells him to leave. Rizwan embarks on a cross-country journey to meet the President of the United States to declare, “My name is Khan, and I am not a terrorist,” seeking to clear his name and win back Mandira’s love.